Login | Site Map | Archives | Electronic Edition | Mobile Edition | Alerts | RSS | Contact Us | Submit News & Photos | Subscriber Services

HomeNewsCrime

Williamston woman's road-rage trial dismissed when officer misses court

STORY TOOLS

— Almost 3 weeks after a Williamston woman was accused of road rage in Anderson, a public defender won dismissal of the charge after the arresting officer was reportedly too sick to be in court.

Judy Beck, 42, of Pine Trail Road stood silently as assistant public defender Scott Thomason told Anderson Municipal Court Judge Hugh Welborn that the accused, a witness and Thomason were prepared for trial even though the officer reportedly called in sick.

And Thomason argued that the officer has not provided discovery materials requested Oct. 31. Under the legal statute, the officer has 30 days to comply.

Welborn agreed to a “conditional dismissal” that would give the officer 10 days to make a motion that would return the case to the court calendar.

On Oct. 27, Beck, who allegedly pulled a knife when a vehicle blocked her path near downtown Anderson, was charged with being armed to the terror of the public.

On Oct 28, Beck was allowed to sign a $1,092.50 bond to consult with an attorney prior to Thursday's trail date.

According to a police report, Beck called 911 around 5:40 p.m. Oct. 27 from King and I streets in Anderson. Telling police that a vehicle driven by Janet Chapman, 44, was blocking her path on King Street, Beck blew her horn and entered into an argument when Chapman got out of her vehicle, according to the report.

When Chapman's children exited the car and joined the argument, Beck allegedly pulled a knife and threatened to use it, Officer Jon Wilkinson wrote in the report.

Chapman told Wilkinson that she opened her door to motion for Beck to go around when Beck “began yelling at her and calling her names,” Wilkinson wrote in the report.

Beck has argued that she was the victim of threats.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Comments are meant to offer our readers a forum for thoughtful, robust debate about local issues.

Comments are moderated, but you may find the content of the conversations offensive, objectionable or factually disputable.

Click here for our user-contributions policy.

Comments

IndependentMail.com does not necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post or respond to every suggestion for a comment to be removed.

Before you post, consider this:

  1. Keep it clean. Comments containing obscene, profane, vulgar, lewd or sexually-oriented language -- including creative spelling and typographical representations of foul language -- will be removed.
  2. Be truthful. Don't lie or spread rumors about anyone or anything. Stick to discussing what is factually known.
  3. Be nice. Don't threaten anyone, and do not post any comments that involve racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person. Hateful or offensive comments will not be tolerated.
  4. Police yourselves. Hit the "Suggest Removal" button to alert us to objectionable comments. Do not respond to trolls or those who seek to harass another poster.
  5. Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  6. Help us get it right. If you have information to add to the story or you find a factual error or misspelling send us an email or call the newsroom at 864-260-1274.

Please read our official user-contributions policy.



Post a comment
(Requires free registration.)

Username:

Password:
(Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

  Want the editors to know how you feel? Click here to say it privately.

Please download the latest version of Adobe Flash Player, or enable JavaScript for your browser to view the video player.